ArticleScientific reports2025
Life cycle assessment of eco-friendly high performance cementitious composites incorporating construction and industrial waste.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In response to growing environmental concern and the demand for high-performance sustainable materials in construction, this study explores the development of a sustainable ultra-high strength engineered cementitious composite (UHS-ECC) through the incorporation of recycled concrete powder (RCP) as a partial cement replacement and waste tire steel fiber (WTSF) as reinforcement. These materials, sourced from construction and industrial waste, aim to reduce the environmental footprint of cementitious composite while maintaining superior mechanical properties. A comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted, evaluating 18 major components, with a focus on the key impact categories including climate change potential, fossil depletion, human toxicity, and particular matter formation. Experimentally, the UHS-ECC achieved a maximum compressive strength of 129 MPa at a 5% RCP replacement level, with a gradual decline observed at higher substitution rates. The LCA results demonstrated significant reductions in environmental impacts, with up to 16% reduction in climate change potential (GWP20) and 19% reduction in fossil resource depletion when substituting cement with RCP, compared to conventional ECC. These findings underscore the potential of RCP and WTSF as viable sustainable alternative in high-strength composite production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.