ArticleScientific reports2025
Network analysis of burnout, depression, and anxiety with occupational and personal outcomes among clinical nurses in China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Network analysis of illegitimate tasks, emotional labor, and turnover intention among clinical nurses: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- The impact of the second victim phenomenon on nurse turnover intentions and absenteeism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Interrelationships of childhood trauma, psychiatric symptoms, neurocognition, and insomnia in chronic schizophrenia: a network perspective.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
- Professional burnout among dietitians and the perceived role of artificial intelligence tools.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Relationships among nomophobia behaviours, fear of missing out, and work immersion among Chinese nurses: a network analysis.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Correlates of Burnout Profiles in Chinese Nurses: A Network Analysis of Psychological and Occupational Factors.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Network analysis of the relationships among burnout, presenteeism, and social support in Chinese pediatric nurses.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chinese nurses face staff shortages and heavy workloads, leading to increased depression, anxiety, and burnout. This study aimed to examine the symptom network of burnout, depression, and anxiety and its associations with negative personal and occupational outcomes among Chinese nurses. A total of 2092 nurses were recruited through snowball sampling. Burnout, depression, and anxiety were assessed using the two single-item burnout measures, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7), respectively. Adverse outcomes, including low quality of life (QOL), suicidal ideation (SI), turnover intention, and medical errors, were also assessed. The network was estimated via the EBICglasso model, and centrality indices and bridge centrality indices were calculated to identify central and bridge symptoms, respectively. The prevalence of depression, anxiety, burnout, low QOL, medical error, turnover intention, and SI was 30.1%, 16.5%, 26.4%, 34.4%, 16.1%, 26.0%, and 26.5%, respectively. Results showed that GAD2 (Uncontrollable worry) was the most central symptom, whereas emotional exhaustion (EX), PHQ8 (Motor), and PHQ4 (Fatigue) were bridge symptoms. Depersonalization (DP) was most strongly associated with adverse work outcomes, and EX was the strongest predictor of poor QOL. The findings highlight the need for early detection and intervention for burnout to mitigate negative impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.