ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning-based prediction of compressive energy absorption in shoe soles with different features.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study conducted 537 force-controlled compression tests on shoe soles to measure strain energy. Various features were studied, including midsole and outsole structures, sole geometry, sole hardness, and loading conditions including applied compression force, angle, and loading speed. Strain energies during compression tests were recorded, followed by correlation analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey tests. Subsequently, different machine learning (ML) algorithms-i.e., simple linear regression (SLR), support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), and multi-layer perceptron (MLP)-were applied for curve fitting. The correlation matrix revealed that strain energy exhibits a strong dependence on the applied force (correlation = 0.89), which stands out significantly compared to other features. This is followed by geometry and shoe hardness, both of which show a correlation of approximately 0.25. To validate these findings, ANOVA tests were conducted, and all p values were significant (p < 0.05). Additionally, it was found that auxetic midsole structures achieve similar strain energy values as simple midsoles (mean = 2.978 J), while maintaining a lighter overall weight. In contrast, weight-reducing holes were not as effective (mean = 2.080 J). It was also shown that initial contact position (i.e., changed with the compression angle) can affect the strain energy; that is, initial contact with the heel generates less strain energy (mean = 2.643 J) compared to the first touch with the toes (mean = 2.839 J). After tuning ML hyperparameters through grid search, RF outperformed other models (MSE = 0.0089), followed by SVR with polynomial kernel (MSE = 0.0105), SVR with RBF kernel (MSE = 0.0146), and MLP (MSE = 0.0251). The developed models offer a practical tool for shoe manufacturers to optimize sole designs and prevent injury during high-stress activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.