ArticleScientific reports2025
Artificial intelligence based sonographic differentiation between skull fractures and normal sutures in young children.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate differentiation between skull fractures and sutures is challenging in young children. Traditional diagnostic modalities like computed tomography involve ionizing radiation, while sonography is safer but demands expertise. This study explores the application of artificial intelligence (AI) to improve diagnostic accuracy in this context. A retrospective study utilized sonographic images of 86 children (mean age: 8.5 months) presenting with suspected skull fractures was performed. The AI approach included binary classification and object localization, with tenfold cross-validation applied to 385 images. The study compared AI performance against nine raters with varying expertise, with and without AI assistance. EfficientNet demonstrated superior classification metrics, with the B6 variant achieving the highest F1 score (0.841) and PR AUC (0.913). YOLOv11 models underperformed compared to EfficientNet in detecting fractures and sutures. Raters significantly benefited from AI-assisted diagnostics, with F1 scores improving from 0.749 (unassisted) to 0.833 (assisted). AI models consistently outperformed unassisted human raters. This study presents the first AI model differentiating skull fractures from sutures on pediatric sonographic images, highlighting AI's potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Future efforts should focus on expanding datasets, validating AI models on independent cohorts, and exploring dynamic sonographic data to improve the diagnostic impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.