ArticleScientific reports2025
Fine-scale predictive modeling of Aedes mosquito abundance and dengue risk indicators using machine learning algorithms with microclimatic variables.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drone-based microclimate analytics reveal vegetation-shade interaction as a key environmental drivers of Aedes-prone microhabitat suitability.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Present and Future of Mosquito-Borne Disease Control in Europe with a Specific Focus on the Mediterranean.Insects · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effective prediction of Aedes mosquito abundance and dengue risk indicators such as the Aedes Index (AI) and Dengue Positive Trap Index (DPTI) is essential for early intervention and targeted vector control. However, current models often rely on coarse regional data and fail to account for microclimatic variations, limiting their predictive accuracy in dengue hotspots. This study developed fine-scale predictive models using machine learning algorithms; Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machines (SVM) to estimate mosquito abundance and dengue risk at the species level based on daily microclimatic data (temperature, relative humidity, and rainfall) collected over 26 weeks in Kuala Selangor, Malaysia. Predictor variables included single, dual, and triple combinations of microclimatic inputs, and models were trained and validated using 10-fold cross-validation and a 70:30 train-test data split. ANN consistently outperformed RF and SVM in predicting the Aedes Index (e.g., Ae. aegypti: MAE = 0.175, RMSE = 0.248), while RF and SVM demonstrated superior performance in DPTI predictions for Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus, respectively. Models incorporating dual or triple microclimatic variables yielded significantly lower error metrics than those using single predictors. Rainfall emerged as the most influential single factor across species. Variations in model performance were likely due to species-specific responses to environmental conditions and the nonlinear interactions captured by the algorithms. Compared to benchmarks in related tropical settings, the reported error metrics demonstrate improved prediction accuracy. Integrating time-lagged microclimatic variables into machine learning frameworks enhances the predictive accuracy of dengue risk indicators at a fine spatial scale. These models provide a data-driven basis for proactive dengue control strategies, enabling timely interventions tailored to specific mosquito species and environmental triggers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.