Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41130984›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Zoonotic potential of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from pets and their owners in Bangladesh.

Himangsu Sarker, Jayedul Hassan, A K M Anisur Rahman, Darren R Korber, Md Mahbub Alam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Comparative genomic analysis ofFrontiers in public health · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Himangsu Sarker *Department of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, 2202, Bangladesh.
Jayedul Hassan *Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, 2202, Bangladesh.
A K M Anisur RahmanDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, 2202, Bangladesh.
Darren R KorberDepartment of Food and Bioproduct Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Md Mahbub AlamDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, 2202, Bangladesh. asamahbub2003@yahoo.com.

Funding

GARE The research was conducted with financial support from the Ministry of Education under the Grants for Advanced Research in Education (GARE) (project no. LS20201464)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), their antimicrobial resistance, virulence determinants, and potential zoonotic potential between pets, owners, and veterinary professionals. From July 2022 to June 2024, 213 human and 191 animal samples (nasal, pus, and wound swabs) were collected from two veterinary hospitals. Staphylococcus aureus was isolated using conventional cultural method and subsequently confirmed through Gram staining, biochemical tests, and PCR targeting the nuc gene. Methicillin resistance was confirmed using the cefoxitin disk diffusion method and PCR for the mecA gene. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the disc diffusion method against 15 antibiotics. Additionally, whole genome sequencing (WGS) was conducted on selected MRSA isolates from pets and their owners to study clonal transmission and virulence factors. The prevalence of MRSA in humans was 15.0%, in cats was 5.8% and in dogs was 13.5%. The MRSA isolates exhibited resistance to penicillin (94.9%), azithromycin (82%), and ciprofloxacin (53.9%), in addition to their intrinsic resistance to cefoxitin. Multidrug resistance was observed in 94.9% of MRSA isolates, though all were sensitive to amikacin, clindamycin, linezolid, and vancomycin. Notably, six dogs and cats, along with their respective owners, tested positive for MRSA. WGS analysis of these six pairs (12 isolates) showed four sequence types (ST), with ST6 being the most common (66.7%). There were also four spa types identified, with t304 being the predominant (58.3%). Within four pairs, identical ST-spa patterns were observed, except for the pair C52-P52 and D88-P88. Two pairs of isolates, C134-P134 and C185-P185, showed clonality based on whole genome and core genome SNP analysis, and other genetic parameters, suggesting clonal transmission between the pets and their respective owners. Virulence profiling revealed the presence of hemolysins, Panton-Valentine Leukocidin, and toxic shock syndrome toxin genes in selected isolates. The detection of diverse MRSA lineages, including human lineages ST80, ST88 and ST6-t304 in pets, indicates their zoonotic potential, and emphasizes the necessity for targeted MRSA surveillance and effective infection control measures. A collaborative One Health approach is therefore imperative to address the spread of MRSA between pets and their owners, thereby mitigating associated risks. The detection of diverse MRSA lineages, including human lineages ST80, ST88, and ST6-t304 in pets, underscores their zoonotic potential and emphasizes the necessity for targeted MRSA surveillance and effective infection control measures. A collaborative One Health approach is therefore imperative to address the spread of MRSA between pets and their owners, thereby mitigating associated risks.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusPetsStaphylococcal InfectionsZoonosesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBangladeshCatsDogsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsVirulence FactorsWhole Genome SequencingAnti-Bacterial AgentsVirulence FactorsMRSAOne HealthOwnersPetsZoonotic potential

Identifiers

PMID41130984
PMCPMC12550073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.