ArticleNature communications2025
DNA computing function switching by programming base stacking interactions with minimal molecular architecture changes.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Programmable DNA Logic Systems for Applications in Biomedicine.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Spatially Encoded Protocell Network for Non-Cascaded Parallel Biocomputation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Dephosphorylation-regulated MNAzyme-PER cascade as a programmable converter for multi-task molecular actuation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In biological systems, molecular network functionalities are usually switched in a flexible, facile, and programmable manner. Mimicking this, substantial studies are directed towards developing synthetic DNA networks that exhibit similar function-switching capabilities, though often hindered by extensive molecular architecture changes and stringent condition controls, which result in a time-consuming and labor-intensive process. Here, we develop a base stacking-mediated allostery strategy to manipulate the DNA computing function switching with minimal molecular architecture changes, usually as few as 1-2 nucleotide changes. We implement up to 20 distinct logic function switching within DNAzyme networks. We also validate our function switching platform to implement totally 84 kinds of gene regulation patterns in cancer cell lines, demonstrating its utility in RNA sensing and green fluorescent protein regulation. This strategy offers a simplified alternative approach to enrich DNA regulations, with potential applications in DNA computing and bioengineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.