ArticleNature communications2025
Categorical and phenotypic image synthetic learning as an alternative to federated learning.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multi-center collaborations are crucial in developing robust and generalizable machine learning models in medical imaging. Traditional methods, such as centralized data sharing or federated learning (FL), face challenges, including privacy issues, communication burdens, and synchronization complexities. We present CATegorical and PHenotypic Image SyntHetic learnING (CATphishing), an alternative to FL using Latent Diffusion Models (LDM) to generate synthetic multi-contrast three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging data for downstream tasks, eliminating the need for raw data sharing or iterative inter-site communication. Each institution trains an LDM to capture site-specific data distributions, producing synthetic samples aggregated at a central server. We evaluate CATphishing using data from 2491 patients across seven institutions for isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation classification and three-class tumor-type classification. CATphishing achieves accuracy comparable to centralized training and FL, with synthetic data exhibiting high fidelity. This method addresses privacy, scalability, and communication challenges, offering a promising alternative for collaborative artificial intelligence development in medical imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.