Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41130789›Full record

SynthesisJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2026

Efficacy of [

Kambiz Rahbar, Frederik L Giesel, Ken Herrmann, Mijin Yun, Tadashi Watabe, Ines Rudolph, Alexander Hoepping, Tobias Maurer

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Detection rate of [Frontiers in medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. The feasibility of [Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Tumor-Targeted Delivery Therapy Based on PLGA Nanoparticles.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Review
  5. Head-to-head comparison betweenJournal of translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kambiz RahbarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany; rahbar@uni-muenster.de.
Frederik L GieselDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Ken HerrmannWest German Cancer Center, Muenster and Essen, Germany.
Mijin YunDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Tadashi WatabeDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Ines RudolphABX Advanced Biochemical Compounds, Biomedizinische Forschungsreagenzien GmbH, Radeberg, Germany; and.
Alexander HoeppingABX Advanced Biochemical Compounds, Biomedizinische Forschungsreagenzien GmbH, Radeberg, Germany; and.
Tobias MaurerDepartment of Urology and Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University of Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staging of prostate carcinoma (PCa) still largely relies on histopathologic examination of prostate tissue. In the last few years, PET/CT with radiotracers that target the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has emerged as a noninvasive and sensitive method for staging of PCa. Compared with [

Indexed as

Fluorine RadioisotopesNiacinamideOligopeptidesPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingFluorine-18Fluorine RadioisotopesNiacinamideOligopeptidesPSMA-1007[18F]PSMA-1007PET/CTprostate carcinomaRadeluminstaging

Identifiers

PMID41130789
PMCPMC12766884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.