Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41130691›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Maximizing Extubation Outcomes Through Educational and Organizational Research (METEOR) Trial: protocol for a batched, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised, type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.

Niall T Prendergast, Jeremy M Kahn, Derek C Angus, Linda Argote, Barbara Barnes, Chung-Chou H Chang, Susan Graff, Dean R Hess, Chukwudi A Onyemekwu, Kimberly J Rak and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05523479 (The Maximizing Extubation Outcomes Through Educational and Organizational Research), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05523479 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

The Maximizing Extubation Outcomes Through Educational and Organizational Research (METEOR) Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2023 to 2026Enrolled13,018ConditionsAcute Respiratory Failure, Airway ExtubationArmsTraditional online education, Interprofessional education, Clinical protocol, Risk-stratified preventive post-extubation noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC), Preventive post-extubation high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Niall T PrendergastDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA prendergastnt@upmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4791-1816
Jeremy M KahnCenter for Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA), Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Derek C AngusCenter for Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA), Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Linda ArgoteTepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Barbara BarnesSchool of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Chung-Chou H ChangDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Susan GraffSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Dean R HessMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Chukwudi A OnyemekwuCenter for Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA), Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kimberly J RakCenter for Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA), Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jennifer L RussellVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Jennifer B SeamanDepartment of Acute and Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kelly M TothCenter for Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA), Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Timothy D GirardCenter for Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA), Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9833-4871

Funding

Organizational strategies for improving evidence-uptake in intensive careR35HL144804 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KAHN, JEREMY M · 2019 to 2025
$6.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R35 HL144804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany patients who are extubated after receiving mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure experience extubation failure (ie, require reintubation hours to days after extubation). High-quality evidence shows that extubating patients directly to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC), rather than conventional low-flow oxygen, can prevent extubation failure. These guideline-recommended interventions, however, require care coordination involving multiple intensive care unit (ICU) team members and are infrequently used. Interprofessional education (IPE), which teaches members of multiple professions together, could effectively address this implementation gap in complex, team-based, critical care settings, particularly when paired with a customisable protocol. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This batched, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised, type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial will test three hypotheses: (1) when compared with traditional online education (OE), IPE increases implementation of preventive postextubation respiratory support, (2) the benefits of IPE are increased when paired with a clinical protocol and (3) preventive postextubation NIV for high-risk patients and preventive postextubation HFNC for low-risk patients reduce in-hospital mortality when compared with conventional postextubation oxygen therapy. The trial will recruit 24 clusters made up of one or more ICUs that care for at least 100 mechanically ventilated patients per year in a large multihospital health system in the USA. All clusters will receive OE, IPE and a clinical protocol, with timing determined by randomisation. We will also randomise half of the clusters to education promoting postextubation NIV for patients at high risk of extubation failure and preventive, postextubation HFNC for patients at lower risk, whereas the other half will be randomised to education promoting postextubation HFNC for all eligible patients. We will include all patients who are invasively mechanically ventilated for at least 24 hours. The primary implementation endpoint is the rate of use of postextubation NIV or HFNC among eligible participants. The primary clinical endpoint is in-hospital mortality truncated at 60 days from intubation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Pittsburgh and an independent data safety monitoring board. We describe the methods herein using the Standard Protocol Items for Randomised Trials framework and discuss key design decisions. We will disseminate results to participating healthcare providers, through publication in a peer-reviewed medical journal and via presentations at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05523479.

Indexed as

Airway ExtubationRespiratory InsufficiencyVentilator WeaningClinical Trials as TopicCritical CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsNoninvasive VentilationOxygen Inhalation TherapyPatient Care TeamRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiration, ArtificialEducation, MedicalImplementation ScienceVentilators, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID41130691
PMCPMC12551497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.