Observational studyArchives of disease in childhood2026
Clinical advisors at NHS 111 improve accuracy for paediatric patients and their advice is more reliably followed: a retrospective observational cohort study.
Observational study in Archives of disease in childhood, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether National Health Service (NHS) 111 advice regarding paediatric patients given by clinically trained health advisors (CHAs) is, as previously found for adult patients, less risk-averse, more accurate and complied with more than that given by non-clinically trained health advisors (NHAs)
designRetrospective observational study using routinely collected, linked NHS urgent care data.
settingNHS 111 triaging services in Yorkshire and the Humber, 2014-2017. PATIENTS: Children (<16 years) who were the subject of a call to NHS 111.
main outcome measuresThe recommendation given, whether the patient attended the emergency department (ED) within 48 hours and if so whether the patient was admitted to hospital, or considered 'non-urgent'. Adjusted logistic regressions were used for analysis.
results972 221 calls were analysed (26.5% CHA; 73.5% NHA). CHAs were more likely than NHAs to recommend guardian/self-care (OR 45, 95% CI 44 to 46), and less likely to recommend ambulance dispatch (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.51), ED attendance (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.77 to 0.8) or primary care (OR 0.163; 95% CI 0.161 to 0.165). Patients were less likely to attend ED following guardian/self-care recommendations from CHAs versus NHAs (OR=0.64; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.74), but no more likely to be admitted if they did attend (OR 1.2; 95% CI 0.8 to 1.8). Callers were more likely to terminate a call before receiving a formal recommendation from a CHA (OR 2.02; 95% CI 2.0 to 2.1). Call-terminators were less likely to attend ED (OR 0.128; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.13) and more likely to be considered non-urgent if attending ED (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.2 to 1.3) if advised by a CHA.
conclusionsPaediatric patient journeys suggest triage by CHAs is less risk-averse and more accurate. Patients are more likely to avoid attending ED if advised to by a CHA. Callers who terminate a call early may typically represent the 'worried well'. CHAs may better identify these patients and discourage them from attending ED in prerecommendation conversation. This has implications for the cost-benefit balance of NHS 111 staffing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.