Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41130662›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2026

Corvis

Vincent Michel Borderie, Cristina Georgeon, Nassim Louissi, Benjamin Memmi, Malika Hamrani, Nacim Bouheraoua, Anatole Chessel

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vincent Michel BorderieOphthalmology, Hôpital National des 15-20, Paris, France vincent.borderie@upmc.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1395-8483
Cristina GeorgeonOphthalmology, Hôpital National des 15-20, Paris, France.
Nassim LouissiOphthalmology, Hôpital National des 15-20, Paris, France.
Benjamin MemmiOphthalmology, Hôpital National des 15-20, Paris, France.
Malika HamraniOphthalmology, Hôpital National des 15-20, Paris, France.
Nacim BouheraouaOphthalmology, Hôpital National des 15-20, Paris, France.
Anatole ChesselLaboratory for Optics and Biosciences, Palaiseau, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo analyse the value of the Corvis

methodsThis institutional retrospective case-control study included 903 eyes with a CSED and 597 normal eyes (controls), assessed with Corvis

main outcome measuresCorvis

resultsStress-strain index (SSI) significantly increased with age in the control group. Compared with controls matched for age/sex, keratoconus was associated with Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI) >0.51 (area under the curve, 0.99), Ambrósio's relational thickness horizontal (ARTh) <425.5 (0.97), deflection amplitude at the time of the first applanation (SPA-A1) <96.3 (0.97) and Pachy<522.4 µm (0.91); high-risk corneas with a difference in CBI between fellow eyes (CBI SYM) >0.14 (0.98), (L2) <1.95 (0.83) and Pachy<549.7 µm (0.71); LCRS with ARTh<455.1 (0.93) and CBI>0.35 (0.83); corneal endothelial disorders with Pachy SYM>19.7 µm (0.83), Pachy>569.1 µm (0.82) and CBI SYM>0.14 (0.77); stromal opacities with SPA-A1 SYM>11.8 (0.92), ARTh<569.9 (0.89), SSI SYM>0.14 (0.89) and CBI>0.22 (0.86). A logistic regression function using all indices reached an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81 for glaucoma diagnosis. The TabPFN model provided the best accuracy (88.7%) for diagnosing the seven corneal conditions. SSI, SPA-A1, CBI and Pachy correlated with keratoconus grade. Keratoplasty for keratoconus improved but failed to restore normal corneal biomechanics.

conclusionsCorvis

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCorneal DiseasesCorneal StromaEndothelium, CornealAdolescentAdultAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaCase-Control StudiesCorneal TopographyFemaleHumansKeratoconusMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesCorneaDiagnostic tests/InvestigationGlaucoma

Identifiers

PMID41130662
PMCPMC13018791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.