ReviewIndian pacing and electrophysiology journal
Antithrombotic management in left sided- ablation and appendage device-closure procedures.
Review in Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation is the most prevalent sustained cardiac arrhythmia, and the therapeutic landscape for stroke prevention has expanded to include catheter ablation for rhythm control and left atrial appendage closure in patients unsuitable for long-term oral anticoagulation. Although minimally invasive, these interventions present complex thrombotic challenges. The left atrial and appendage environment is inherently prothrombotic due to structural remodeling, endothelial injury, blood stasis, and abnormal hemostasis-processes further amplified by procedural instrumentation such as transseptal puncture during left-sided ablation and structural interventions. Antithrombotic management requires a balance between thromboembolic prevention and bleeding risk. Pre-procedural imaging with transesophageal echocardiography or cardiac computed tomography remains essential for thrombus detection and risk stratification peri-procedurally. Direct oral anticoagulants provide pharmacokinetic advantages over vitamin K antagonists, including shorter half-lives and greater predictability, thereby facilitating periprocedural management. Post-procedural therapy must be individualized on the basis of stroke risk, device-related findings, and patient-specific characteristics. This review synthesizes current evidence on antithrombotic strategies in the setting of left-sided cardiac interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.