ReviewDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2025
Intergenerational neuroimaging's present and future: Considering sex as a biological variable to enhance knowledge of brain development through parent-offspring similarity.
Review in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parental brain responses to own and unknown children's emotional facial expressions: An fMRI study.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Parent-Child Cortical Similarity Indexes Multiple Dimensions of Sensitivity in the Association Between Family Environment and Adolescent Internalizing Symptoms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intergenerational neuroimaging, which is used to investigate brain similarities between parent-offspring dyads, promises to elucidate the neural substrates of intergenerational transmission. However, merely identifying similar brain regions or networks between parents and offspring is not sufficient to reveal the mechanisms underlying this transmission. To understand these mechanisms, it is necessary to consider the potential contributions of shared genetic and environmental factors to the development of brain features that are similar between parents and offspring. Sex as a biological variable (SABV), a key factor in intergenerational neuroimaging, provides crucial insights into brain development. Although sex-based differences in brain developmental trajectories have been investigated, the role of SABV in parent-offspring brain similarity has been overlooked. In this narrative review, we summarize the key findings of previous intergenerational neuroimaging studies, grouping them into three categories based on study design: studies of mother-offspring dyads, studies combining fathers and mothers, and studies distinguishing between father-offspring and mother-offspring dyads. Furthermore, we highlight the genetic and environmental factors that may underlie sex-specific parent-offspring brain similarities. Finally, we propose further considerations to clarify the significance of parent-offspring brain similarity in human brain development. Advancements in intergenerational neuroimaging may shed light on mechanisms by which mental health risk is transmitted across generations, potentially providing opportunities for more effective prevention, stratification, and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.