Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41129808›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Exploration of Digital Interventions for Vaping Cessation: Scoping Review.

Karlee Fonteyne, Elizabeth Keys, Khalad Hasan, Laura Struik

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karlee FonteyneSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia, 1147 Research Road, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada, 1 250-807-9972.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1302-0732
Elizabeth KeysSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia, 1147 Research Road, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada, 1 250-807-9972.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0251-0720
Khalad HasanDepartment of Computer Science, Mathematics, Physics and Statistics, Irving K. Barber Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4815-5461
Laura StruikSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia, 1147 Research Road, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada, 1 250-807-9972.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7175-7308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Digital interventions have emerged as a promising approach to support vaping cessation, particularly among youth and young adults. Mobile apps, text messaging programs, telehealth-delivered contingency management, and web-based or social media interventions offer scalable and accessible alternatives to traditional cessation methods. However, there is considerable variation in how these interventions are designed, implemented, and evaluated, with inconsistencies in engagement strategies, theoretical frameworks, and long-term effectiveness. Objective: This scoping review aimed to map the current landscape of digital interventions for vaping cessation and identify key strategies, effectiveness outcomes, and implementation challenges. The following questions were addressed: (1) What digital interventions have been developed or evaluated for vaping cessation? (2) What evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of these digital interventions in promoting vaping cessation and user engagement? (3) What key barriers and facilitators influence the adoption, adherence, and success of digital vaping cessation interventions? (4) What gaps remain in the literature, and what areas should future research prioritize to enhance the design and effectiveness of digital vaping cessation tools? Methods: This scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and adhered to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO using search terms related to vaping cessation and digital health interventions. Studies examining mobile apps, text messaging programs, social media or web-based interventions, and telehealth coaching explicitly designed for vaping cessation were included. A narrative synthesis was conducted to identify common themes, barriers, and facilitators. Results: Sixteen studies were identified, including SMS text messaging programs, mobile apps, telehealth-delivered contingency management, and web-based or social media interventions. Many interventions reported moderate to high abstinence rates. Programs incorporating personalized messaging, behavioral tracking, and social and interactive features demonstrated greater retention and cessation success. However, minimal application of evidence-based behavior change frameworks, inconsistent reporting of engagement metrics, reliance on self-reported abstinence, and scalability limitations were noted. Conclusions: Digital interventions show promise for vaping cessation, particularly among youth and young adults, but current evidence highlights both opportunities and limitations. Effective interventions leverage personalization and social support to enhance engagement and quit outcomes. However, challenges such as high dropout rates, accessibility barriers, and limited use of rigorous evaluation methods persist. Future research should prioritize hybrid approaches that combine digital support with human interaction, apply equity-focused design principles, and adopt pragmatic, theory-driven evaluation methods to accelerate translation from pilot success to sustainable public health impact.

Indexed as

VapingHumansMobile ApplicationsSmoking CessationSocial MediaTelemedicineText Messagingbehaviour changecontingency managementdigital interventionse-cigarette cessationmobile healthtelehealthtext messaging programsvaping cessationyouth and young adults

Identifiers

PMID41129808
PMCPMC12548964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.