Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41129763›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2025

National Cancer Institute's Working Group on Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Clinical Trial Design Considerations.

David J Einstein, Melissa L Abel, Jeanny B Aragon-Ching, Philip M Arlen, Karen A Autio, Marijo Bilusic, Michael A Carducci, Peter L Choyke, Deborah E Citrin, William D Figg and 22 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

David J EinsteinBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Melissa L AbelCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0001-8941-0206
Jeanny B Aragon-ChingInova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA.ORCID 0000-0002-6714-141X
Philip M ArlenCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Karen A AutioMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0003-0720-0390
Marijo BilusicDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.ORCID 0000-0003-1020-689X
Michael A CarducciSidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-7908-1215
Peter L ChoykeCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Deborah E CitrinCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-4391-2734
William D FiggCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-2428-5613
Julie N GraffPortland Veteran's Administration, Portland, OR.ORCID 0000-0002-5708-2794
James L GulleyCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-6569-2912
Susan HalabiDivision of Biostatistics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-4135-2777
Fatima KarzaiCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-3244-1332
Liza LindenbergCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-8514-0648
Mark C MarkowskiSidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-2780-5100
Catherine H MarshallSidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-2653-4110
Douglas G McNeelDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.ORCID 0000-0003-1471-6723
Esther MenaCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Helen MoonDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Riverside Medical Center, Riverside, CA.
Russell K PachynskiDivision of Oncology, Washington University, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0002-8966-7631
Channing J PallerSidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-3658-1858
Krishnan R PatelCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-2120-1939
Edwin M PosadasSamuel Oschin Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-8649-1346
Kenneth J PientaSidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-4138-2186
Meredith M ReganDivision of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-2428-6109
Laura A SenaSidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0001-6724-9546
Charlotte S WalmsleyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Xiao X WeiDivision of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Evan Y YuFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0002-1510-8044
Phuoc T TranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-0147-0376
Ravi A MadanCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0001-5106-8636

Funding

Resource Sharing CoreU54CA273956 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Amit Sawant, Nicole L Simone · 2022 to 2026
$8.9M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA273956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBiochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) after definitive surgery and/or radiation (including salvage strategies) is a burgeoning area of clinical research inspired by ultrasensitive next-generation imaging. Most phase III trials in PCa have focused on metastatic disease, defined by conventional imaging. Despite the emergence of new imaging, clinical trial principles from metastatic studies will not optimize future BCR trials.

methodsA Working Group convened at the National Cancer Institute on November 13, 2024 (NCI BCR WG). Key areas of discussion included nomenclature, baseline criteria for data capture, imaging considerations, delineation of high-risk populations to be targeted for trial development, requirements of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) or hormonal therapy, quality-of-life considerations, and potential study end points.

resultsThe NCI BCR WG defined the novel term "prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)+BCR" to identify the emerging concept of recurrent PCa identifiable only on PSMA positron emission tomography (PET), overlapping with BCR and distinct from metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa as traditionally defined by conventional imaging. The WG suggested defining high-risk BCR with a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of ≤6 months, regardless of PET findings. The WG provided recommendations for baseline data capture and imaging requirements. Neither systemic therapy nor MDT were considered mandatory for control arms. The WG also discussed novel end points and quality-of-life metrics in this disease space.

conclusionThese discussions should inform future clinical BCR trials in this distinct disease space relative to metastatic disease defined by conventional imaging. The NCI BCR WG strongly advocates that future trials explore deintensification of treatment to minimize toxicity in this relatively indolent disease state.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstatic NeoplasmsResearch DesignHumansMaleNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)Prostate-Specific AntigenQuality of LifeUnited StatesProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID41129763
PMCPMC13361136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.