ReviewChemical reviews2025
Single Crystal Cathode Materials for Lithium-Based Batteries: Synthesis, Scaleup, and Manufacturing.
Review in Chemical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxygen Partial Pressure as a Kinetic Descriptor for Single-Crystal Morphology in Mid-Nickel Layered Cathodes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Nanostructured Cathode Materials for Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Batteries: Synthesis, Morphology, and Performances.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Advancing Battery Manufacturing: Synchrotron Characterization for Industry.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Stress-homogenized spatial architectures via entropy-driven self-assembly enabling high-performance and durable lithium extraction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monocrystalline solids have been broadly used in many fields, including batteries, electronics, and optics. Monocrystalline cathode materials have regained intensive study in recent years because of their potential to stabilize the cathode-electrolyte interphase at elevated voltages and/or reduce gassing from high capacity nickel-rich cathode materials; thus, more energy can be extracted from the same materials, except that they are converted into grain boundary-free particles, or so-called "single crystals" in the battery field. This work reviews the history, current progress, and future trends of single crystal cathodes for lithium-based batteries with a focus on cost-effective synthesis, scaleup, and manufacturing. Much work is needed to reduce manufacturing costs of single crystal cathodes, from the selection of precursors and synthesis routes to morphology control and equipment design. This review highlights the importance of cost-oriented fundamental research and processing science to accelerate battery materials manufacturing and establish a resilient manufacturing chain for versatile energy storage technologies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.