ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
Timing and Pattern of Early Diversification in Drosophilidae (Diptera).
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Horizontal gene transfer rivals gene duplication as a source of anti-parasitoid immune innovation in the Drosophilidae.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite their relevance as model organisms, the early diversification patterns in Drosophilidae remain poorly resolved, with most studies focusing on Drosophila. Here, we employed a phylogenomic framework for 33 taxa: 27 drosophilid species representing most tribes of both subfamilies (Drosophilinae and Steganinae) plus 6 taxa from other families of Ephydroidea (Braulidae, Cryptochetidae, Curtonotidae, and Ephydridae). Besides inferring phylogenetic relationships, we estimated divergence times and substitution rates using a fossil-calibrated Bayesian approach. Our results recover Drosophilinae as monophyletic (among the taxa sampled) but place Braula coeca (Braulidae) within Steganinae, rendering Drosophilidae nonmonophyletic and underscoring the need for taxonomic revision. Relationships within Steganinae (including Braula) were fully resolved, whereas the position of some Drosophilinae lineages (eg Scaptodrosophila) remains uncertain, likely due to extensive gene tree heterogeneity. Divergence time estimates suggest that the family originated near the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary (67.3 Ma; 95% highest posterior density: 83 to 52 Ma), with subfamilies diversifying primarily during the Eocene (56 to 34 Ma). The neutral evolutionary rate, estimated from fossil calibrations and third codon positions, aligns with previous biogeographically calibrated estimates but is lower than mutation-derived rates, likely reflecting the action of purifying selection and uncertainty about generation times across lineages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.