Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41129588›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2025

Estimating the effect on obesity of delaying tax-based interventions in Mexico: A modeling study.

Martha Carnalla, Francisco Reyes-Sánchez, Alexis Alonso-Bastida, Alan Reyes-García, Alessio Hernández-Rojas, C Gabriela García, Isabel Junquera-Badilla, Ana Basto-Abreu, Boyd Swimburn, Juan A Rivera and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Martha CarnallaCentro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1427-2915
Francisco Reyes-SánchezCentro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6423-180X
Alexis Alonso-BastidaCentro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8563-9767
Alan Reyes-GarcíaCentro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, México.
Alessio Hernández-RojasCentro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6873-4674
C Gabriela GarcíaCentro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5520-8568
Isabel Junquera-BadillaCentro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, México.
Ana Basto-AbreuCentro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1600-4797
Boyd SwimburnSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Juan A RiveraCentro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, México.
Tonatiuh Barrientos-GutiérrezCentro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0826-9106

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) launched the Acceleration Plan to STOP Obesity, highlighting the urgent need for timely implementation of proven interventions. Fiscal policies, including taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) and non-essential energy-dense foods (NEDF), are among the most cost-effective strategies to reduce obesity rates. Delays in adopting or strengthening these measures can undermine their impact, and the consequences of postponing such policies remain unmeasured. We aimed to estimate the expected impact of delaying doubling the SSB and NEDF tax in Mexico. METHODS AND

findingsWe simulated a closed cohort of Mexican adults aged 20 years and over from 2021 to 2040. The simulated sample corresponded to the combination of the 2020-22 Health and Nutrition Surveys, which contained anthropometric and demographic information representative at a national level. We projected annual average Body Mass Index (BMI), obesity prevalence, deaths averted, and years lived without obesity (YLWO) under four scenarios: status quo and doubling the current tax on SSB and NEDF in 2025, 2030, and 2035. BMI was projected from 2021 to 2040 using Hall's microsimulation weight change model, and a Mexican projection of total energy intake. To simulate deaths, we estimated the probability of all-cause mortality by BMI category from the National Population Council projections of the Mexican population by age and year. By 2040, doubling the taxes in 2025 resulted in an obesity prevalence of 41.6% (95% Uncertainty Interval [40.2,43.1]) in contrast to the status quo scenario (44.5%, 95% Uncertainty Interval [43.2,45.8]), and 170,600 deaths averted (95% Uncertainty Interval [130,900, 210,200]) and 25,031,900 (95% Uncertainty Interval [19,048,500, 31,015,300]) YLWO gained. A delayed intervention in 2035 resulted in an obesity prevalence of 41.7% (95% Uncertainty Interval [40.4,43.1]), 38,900 deaths averted (95% Uncertainty Interval [29,600, 48,200]), and 4,473,700 (95% Uncertainty Interval [3,378,900, 5,568,500]) YLWO gained. Our results apply only to individuals aged 20 years or older in 2021, excluding cohorts reaching age 20 between 2022 and 2040.

conclusionsOur results emphasize the urgency of advancing WHO's Acceleration Plan to STOP Obesity. Postponing evidence-based interventions is estimated to exacerbate the burden of obesity, mortality, and suffering.

Indexed as

ObesitySugar-Sweetened BeveragesTaxesAdultAgedBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansMaleMexicoMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysPrevalenceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41129588
PMCPMC12548904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.