Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41129565›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Predicting residue ionization of OmpF channel using Constant pH Molecular Dynamics as benchmark.

Ernesto Tavares-Neto, Marcel Aguilella-Arzo, Vicente M Aguilella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ernesto Tavares-NetoLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Department of Physics, Universitat Jaume I, Castellon, Spain.
Marcel Aguilella-ArzoLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Department of Physics, Universitat Jaume I, Castellon, Spain.
Vicente M AguilellaLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Department of Physics, Universitat Jaume I, Castellon, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2420-2649

Funding

Generalitat ValencianaSpanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrostatic interactions are crucial for protein structure and function, especially in mesoscopic protein channels where ion selectivity is largely governed by the protein's electrostatic properties. Understanding the protonation state of ionizable residues across pH values -often described by their pKa- is key to linking structure and function. However, experimental pKa determination is challenging, typically carried out using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance only in a limited number of membrane proteins. Thus, computational methods are the primary alternative. Constant pH Molecular Dynamics (CpHMD) simulation is one of the most accurate pKa prediction methods in proteins that contain many charged residues since it captures the coupling between conformational dynamics and residue protonation. Here we study the charge state of a general diffusion porin, OmpF, in which protons exert a crucial regulation of the channel discrimination of small inorganic ions as well as antibiotic translocation. We compare different pKa prediction methods, using CpHMD as a benchmark, and discuss the somewhat unusual titration of several acidic residues. The most widely used pKa prediction methods, though effective for globular proteins, fall short for membrane-embedded channels either because they were trained using pKa measurements in globular proteins or because of a poor description of the lipidic environment.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationPorinsBenchmarkingComputational BiologyHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationProtein ConformationProtonsStatic ElectricityOmpF proteinPorinsProtons

Identifiers

PMID41129565
PMCPMC12578334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.