ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Investigating cement-based surfaces as a sustainable flooring solution to improve Ascaris Suum egg removal and inactivation in low-resource settings.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil-transmitted helminths, like Ascaris lumbricoides, are significant contributors to disease burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Infections are associated with morbidity and mortality in children and are often transmitted through eggs in fecally contaminated soil. Interventions, like replacing household soil floors with cement-based alternatives, may reduce exposure to A. lumbricoides eggs, but there are currently no estimates on the removal or survival of Ascaris species eggs on cement-based surfaces. This study addresses that knowledge gap by evaluating the removal of Ascaris suum eggs from mopping and the survival of A. suum eggs on two cement-based mixes: an traditional mortar and a mortar with fly ash, which provides a more sustainable alternative to the traditional mortar mix. We assessed egg survival at two temperatures representing the dry (15°C) and wet (34°C) seasons in Bangladesh using two different egg enumeration methods. After mopping, a mean of 95.6% (SD = 4.0%) of viable eggs were removed from surfaces, with no significant differences between cement-based mixes (p = 0.51). The mean first-order decay rate constants (k) of A. suum eggs across all conditions was 0.029 day-1 (SD = 0.074 day-1). Values of k were similar between mix designs (p = 0.62) but varied significantly between temperatures (p = 4.2x10-25) and egg enumeration methods (p = 2.4x10-8). The k values were greater at 34°C compared to at 15°C, where they showed no significant inactivation. Our k values were comparable to those reported previously for different matrices, indicating comparable inactivation of Ascaris species eggs on cement-based surfaces compared to liquid and semi-solid matrices. These results provide some of the first estimates of removal efficiencies and decay rate constants in realistic environmental conditions for Ascaris species on surfaces while supporting the use of mortar mix designs with fly ash in interventions to reduce Ascaris species transmission in rural LMIC households.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.