Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41129540›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A qualitative exploration of NHS-staff social identification with mindfulness in-groups and engagement with mindful practices.

Daniel Cullen, Kate Cavanagh, Clara Strauss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel CullenSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2404-9421
Kate CavanaghSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Clara StraussSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesMindfulness practice has been widely adopted by healthcare staff, being grounded in evidence and supported by national guidelines. However, certain fundamental factors are not well understood, including attitudes towards mindfulness in-groups. The aim of this project was to explore the nature of social identification with mindfulness in-groups in relation to engagement with mindful practices.

methodsTwenty healthcare staff from three healthcare Trusts were recruited to engage in semi-structured interviews of one-hour duration. Transcripts of these interviews were then subjected to reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsSocial identification was simultaneously rich and fluid, with some tentative evidence of positive boosts to psychological engagement tempered by dissonance about current physical engagement levels. Healthcare and mindfulness identities complemented, in that being aided doing, aligning values and aspirations, although clashes also presented through culture, depending on one's sense of connection/disconnection. DISCUSSION/

conclusionsEmployers and trainers could consider implementing strategies to enhance social identification with mindfulness in-groups. Further research should also explore whether strength of social identification translates into improved engagement with mindful practices.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelMindfulnessSocial IdentificationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchState Medicine

Identifiers

PMID41129540
PMCPMC12548848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.