ArticlePloS one2025
Lychee13-3634: A new lychee image dataset and classification methodological evaluation.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid and accurate classification of lychee varieties is crucial for improving production efficiency and optimizing market supply. Especially for the main production areas of lychee, efficient lychee classification is more urgent. However, there is currently no publicly available comprehensive and diverse lychee benchmark dataset for precise training of classification models. To fill this gap, this work constructs a comprehensive lychee image dataset (Lychee13-3634), which covers 13 varieties and 3634 images. Different from the general fruit datasets, which show significant differences in features between their fruit images, Lychee13-3634 highlights minor inter-class differences among various lychee varieties. Based on this dataset, we applied 20 advanced deep learning-based classification models to validate its availability and effectiveness. Meanwhile, we comprehensively evaluated and provided meaningful insights about all models. Experimental results show that EfficientNetv2 has the best classification performance with an accuracy of up to 99.90%. Besides, we further comprehensively analyzed the balance of Lychee13-3634, and the corresponding experiments demonstrate that a more balanced dataset usually leads to better classification performance of the model. In summary, Lychee13-3634 provides benchmark training data for the lychee image classification task and demonstrates the effective application of existing deep learning classification models, providing reference and inspiration for other agricultural product image recognition research. Our Lychee13-3634 and all evaluation models are available at https://github.com/jyanhuang/Lychee13-3634.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.