ArticlePloS one2025
Family support after a family member's suicide: A qualitative exploration.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surviving the Tsunami of Receiving a 'Goodbye' Note.Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Correction: Family support after a family member's suicide: A qualitative exploration.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suicide bereavement presents unique challenges that shape how grief is experienced and supported within relational networks. Although family members often serve as a primary source of support, the interpersonal dynamics underlying such support remain understudied. This study explores how individuals bereaved by a family member's suicide experience social support within the shared grief context of the family. Fifteen adults participated in semi-structured interviews conducted as part of a mixed-methods project in Germany, examining experiences and determinants of social support following suicide loss. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis, combining inductive and deductive coding. Two overarching themes were identified: (1) Contextual factors of family support, including grief reactions and coping patterns, shifts in family dynamics, and the distribution of support roles; and (2) Characteristics of family support, encompassing both supportive experiences-such as emotional closeness, open communication, and shared sense-making-and insufficient support-such as marginalization of grief and emotional neglect, often linked to pre-existing family strain. The availability and quality of support were influenced by protective buffering, relational withdrawal, discomfort surrounding suicide disclosure, and the reconfiguration of relationships after the loss. Extended family members played a significant role in assisting with childcare and relieving emotional burdens on grieving parents, although their support varied depending on attitudes toward suicide and levels of proactive engagement. Family support in suicide bereavement emerged as a dynamic process shaped by personal, relational, and sociocultural influences. These findings highlight the need for multilevel, integrative theoretical frameworks to capture the complexity of family support after suicide. This study underscores the value of systemic postvention strategies that foster emotional expression, shared sense-making, and stigma reduction, while recognizing that family may not be an accessible or supportive resource for all bereaved individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.