ArticlePloS one2025
Development of a self-administered questionnaire to identify levers and barriers to adherence to medication regimens for chronic disease: The QUILAM project.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to develop a generic questionnaire for use in routine clinical practice to identify barriers and levers to medication adherence, particularly for patients with chronic disease, in order to implement targeted interventions. MATERIALS AND
methodsTo generate items we conducted a narrative literature review and qualitatively analyzed semi-structured interviews of patients with chronic diseases (type 2 diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure). Items were classified according to the five dimensions that influence medication adherence proposed by the WHO. Qualitative reduction of the number of items was conducted by a panel of experts. This long questionnaire was tested on ambulatory patients and analysis of responses enabled quantitative item reduction. Validation of the short questionnaire and stability over time was tested on an independent cohort of patients, and again 15 days later.
resultsThe 194 items extracted from the literature review (validated in several pathologies) and/or from analysis of 45 interviews, spanned all five dimensions of medication adherence according to the WHO. The expert panel reduced the number of items to 62. The analysis of responses from 112 patients using factorial component analysis reduced the final questionnaire to 14 questions each scored on a 7-point Likert-type scale. A validated visual analogue scale (0-100) was added to evaluate medication adherence in general. The final version was well accepted by patients and took 5-10 minutes to complete, with little missing data. In an independent community pharmacy population (n = 55) concordance of the results between day 0 and day 15 was acceptable.
conclusionThis generic questionnaire (initially developed in French) for the identification of barriers and levers to medication adherence in patients with chronic disease could help care teams to structure and propose help-with-adherence visits to their patients and personalize interventions to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.