Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41129502›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Methodology for predicting hospital admissions and evaluating recovery rates for coronavirus disease in Japan.

Koichiro Maki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Koichiro MakiMakisolu LLC., Shiroi-Shi, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7036-7129

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to propose a method to predict the number of patients needing hospitalization using a combination of available technologies. We developed a method to predict the number of hospital admissions by combining a simple susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) model with the relationship between the number of new positive cases and the number of hospital admissions, increasing the reliability of each prediction. The accuracy of the concordance between the actual number of patients and the predicted number of hospitalized patients was 99%. Owing to the high accuracy, we were also able to establish a method to evaluate recovery rates. This facilitated determination of the effectiveness of measures implemented throughout Japan to reduce the number of treatment days. The model developed in this study facilitates immediate estimation of the maximum number and timing of hospitalizations based on the peak of new positive cases. Moreover, it provides a statistically true value of the recovery rate required by the mathematical model for investigating countermeasures.

Indexed as

COVID-19HospitalizationPatient AdmissionHumansJapanModels, TheoreticalSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID41129502
PMCPMC12548901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.