ArticleJournal of psychopathology and clinical science2025
Differential associations of passively sensed behaviors with in-vivo depression symptoms.
Article in Journal of psychopathology and clinical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research suggests that passively sensed behaviors can serve as indicators for depression in aggregate-however, depression is a multifaceted construct, individual facets of which may differentially relate to sensed features. We examined relationships of in-vivo individual depression facets (affect, stress, fatigue, and distractibility) with passively sensed location, communication, and phone-use data. Participants (N = 734, 73.57% female, Mage = 41.6) with moderate depression symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-8; M = 13.2) responded to ecological momentary assessments of affect, stress, fatigue, and distractibility 3×/day every 3 weeks for 16 weeks; passive data were continuously collected. Using multilevel modeling, we tested within- and between-person associations of depression-related ecological momentary assessments with passive features. When people spent more time in frequently visited locations relative to their own average, they reported more positive affect (β = .03, p = .043). Relatedly, increased within-person circadian movement was associated with less stress (β = .032, p = .035). When people communicated via call/text more relative to their own average, they reported increased negative affect (β = -.05, p = .008), stress (β = -.076, p < .001), and distractibility (β = -.048, p = .006). When people used social media more than typical for them, they reported less stress (β = .030, p = .047) and less fatigue (β = .034, p = .021). Findings highlight potential opportunities for depression symptom monitoring and treatment. The dual positive effect of novel environments and routine stability, along with nuanced findings around communication patterns, invite further investigation into factors that may elucidate how passively sensed behaviors surface in depression, in service of informing just-in-time adaptive intervention development. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.