Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41129150›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Mode of Patient Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Disclosure and Receipt of Tailored Cancer Resources.

Victor Basil, Charles Kamen, Austin R Waters, N F N Scout, Megan A Mullins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Victor BasilDepartment of Health Economics, Systems, and Policy, Peter O'Donnell Jr School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Charles KamenDepartment of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Austin R WatersDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
N F N ScoutNational LGBT Cancer Network, Providence, Rhode Island.
Megan A MullinsDepartment of Health Economics, Systems, and Policy, Peter O'Donnell Jr School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: For lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, and other (LGBTQ+) individuals with cancer, disclosing sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) in a safe clinical environment can improve survivorship outcomes and satisfaction. Although SOGI disclosure can facilitate patient-centered care, little is known about whether SOGI information is being used to improve care or how use may vary by mode of SOGI disclosure. Objective: To assess whether the mode of SOGI disclosure (self-disclosed, clinic collected, not disclosed, or other) is associated with receipt of clinical resources tailored to LGBTQ+ individuals among cancer survivors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study uses data from the OUT National Cancer Survey, a web-based survey of LGBTQ+ adults with a history of cancer in the US, collected from September 2020 through March 2021. The study comprised a convenience sample of 2342 LGBTQ+ cancer survivors. Main Outcome and Measures: Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between SOGI disclosure mode and receipt of at least 1 clinical resource tailored to LGBTQ+ individuals related to mental health, tobacco use, alcohol use, physical activity, or survivorship care. The primary exposure was mode of SOGI disclosure. Covariates included age, cancer type, current cancer status, and region. Results: This national sample of 2342 LGBTQ+ cancer survivors (mean [SD] age, 58.4 [16.7] years; 1428 assigned male at birth [61%]) included 79 Black participants (3%), 136 Hispanic participants (6%), 2019 White participants (86%), 64 multiracial participants (3%), and 90 participants of other race or ethnicity (4%). A total of 1394 participants (60%) identified as cisgender male, and 775 (33%) as cisgender female, and the most common sexual orientation was gay (1272 [54%]). Participants reported many cancer types, with genitourinary cancers being most common (523 [22%]). Most respondents (1798 [77%]) indicated that their care team knew their LGBTQ+ identity, with disclosure most often via self-disclosure (804 [34%]) or clinic collection (944 [42%]). Only 174 (7%) received an LGBTQ+ survivorship care plan, and 892 (38%) received at least 1 resource tailored to LGBTQ+ individuals. Compared with those with clinic-collected SOGI disclosure, those who did not disclose SOGI information (odds ratio [OR], 0.58 [95% CI, 0.44-0.78]) or who self-disclosed SOGI information (OR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.69-1.02]) had lower odds of receiving any tailored resources. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of SOGI disclosure and use, few LGBTQ+ cancer survivors received tailored clinical resources despite high rates of SOGI disclosure. Clinical use of SOGI information remained limited, especially when it was not collected systematically. Efforts should prioritize both safe SOGI data collection and its integration into patient-centered care.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsDisclosureGender IdentityNeoplasmsSelf DisclosureSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexual BehaviorAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41129150
PMCPMC12550635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.