ReviewIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2025
A Re-Exploration of our Unconscious: What We Have Come To Unmask; What Still Lies Beneath.
Review in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Commentary On Tsikandilakis Et Al. (2025)-Subtleties of Awareness Help Explain Discrepancies Between Conscious and Unconscious Perception Interpretations: Implications for Researchers and Their Participants.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2026Article
- Updated Expectations are Needed for Masked Priming Experiments: Commentary on Tsikandilakis et al. (2025).Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2026Article
- From Subliminality, to the Unconscious Mind: Philosophical Lineages, Evolutionary Paradoxes, and the Future of the Origins of the Unconscious.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this manuscript, concepts, issues and resolutions that call for conscious awareness in research into the unconscious are revisited and reviewed. Historical episodes and episodes of controversial experimentation that are formative rallying points for understanding contemporary attitudes to the unconscious in psychological science, and the impact of historical controversy to contemporary polarisation, are meticulously discussed. The theoretical debates, methodological inquiries and contributing resolutions that have stemmed from these controversies are cited and discoursed. Replicated empirical illustrations, that show how purportedly established and well-known biases persist, and previously unaddressed methodological biases occur, and how we may resolve them, are experimentally demonstrated. We show that resolutions are still pending further advances within the - frequently overlooked - limitations of our current scientific paradigm. As a seminal communication, stemming from engaging with these themes, concepts, issues and resolutions, the contextual importance and research value of a reminding, and combined scholarly-theoretical and applied-empirical conscious understanding of unconscious research is carefully emphasised and accentuated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.