Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41129025›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2025

The Ross Procedure: Historical Context, Modern Outcomes, and the Road Ahead.

Christian Eidson, Andrew Well, Joseph Turek, Carlos M Mery, Ziv Beckerman

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christian EidsonVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Andrew WellDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Division of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Joseph TurekDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Carlos M MeryDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Division of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Ziv BeckermanDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Division of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA. z.beckerman@vumc.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThere remains no single perfect aortic valve replacement option in patients with aortic valve disease. In this manuscript, we will discuss the modern role of the Ross Procedure in children and adults with aortic valve disease. RECENT

findingsCurrently, the Ross procedure is the only established operation that allows replacement of the aortic valve with living, growing tissue. Use of the Ross procedure for aortic valve replacement has waxed and waned in recent decades. However, in recent years, with reports from long-term data series, interest has been redirected at the Ross procedure due to its excellent durability and freedom from long-term valvular morbidity and mortality. In patients requiring aortic valve replacement, the Ross procedure offers excellent short- and long-term outcomes and can be tailored to specific pathologies and the needs of individual patients. In this patient population, it is the only intervention that restores life expectancy to that of the general population. The Ross procedure remains a superb intervention for the treatment of aortic valve disease in children and adults in the modern era and should be heavily considered as an option when aortic valve replacement is required.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveAortic Valve DiseaseHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationPulmonary ValveAdultChildHeart Valve ProsthesisHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansTreatment OutcomeAortic Valve DiseaseAortic Valve ReplacementOutcomesRoss Procedure

Identifiers

PMID41129025
PMCPMC12549422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.