Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41129005›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2025

Validating Patient-Reported Outcomes and Surveys in Other Languages.

Vivian E Kwok, Agustin Diaz, Emma Grellinger, Ishaan Swarup

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vivian E KwokSchool of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Vivian.kwok@ucsf.edu.
Agustin DiazSchool of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Emma GrellingerSchool of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ishaan SwarupDivision of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, University of California San Francisco, Oakland, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe aim to summarize the validation of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in orthopaedic conditions, particularly for non-English languages. We also identify completed translations and areas of ongoing need to support the expansion and broader adoption of PROMs in orthopaedic surgery. RECENT

findingsRecent translations and cross-cultural adaptations of PROMs used in orthopaedic surgery continue to employ robust methods for validation. Many PROMs have undergone extensive translations since their initial development. There has also been a large volume of recent work to translate PROMs used in orthopaedic surgery, with more than 45 studies. While some PROMs are available in a wide range of different languages, some PROMs have undergone fewer translations. Additionally, while there has been ongoing work to translate tools and surveys used in orthopaedic surgery, a small proportion of these translated PROMs reflect that of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons-preferred list of PROMs.

Indexed as

Cross-cultural adaptationLanguage accessNon-English translationOrthopaedic surgeryPatient reported outcome measuresSurvey validation

Identifiers

PMID41129005
PMCPMC12549504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.