ArticleFamilial cancer2025
Adenoma and carcinoma in the anal transitional zone following hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis.
Article in Familial cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the standard surgical treatment for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) in our institution. Stapled and hand-sewn IPAA differ in the amount of retained rectal mucosa, influencing both adenoma risk and functional outcomes. In this retrospective cohort study, we compared oncological and functional outcomes between the two techniques. Consecutive patients with FAP who underwent RPC with IPAA at Seoul National University Hospital between 1994 and 2022 were included. The ATZ adenoma and cancer occurrence, operative time, and anorectal functional outcomes were compared between hand-sewn and stapled anastomosis groups. The cumulative incidence risk of adenoma recurrence was compared using the log-rank test. 89 patients were analyzed: 32 underwent hand-sewn and 57 underwent stapled IPAA. Median follow-up was 100 months in the stapled group and 79 months in the hand-sewn group. Stapled IPAA was associated with shorter operative time (220.6 vs. 332.9 min, p < 0.001), lower diverting ileostomy rate (78.9% vs. 96.9%, p = 0.027), and lower Wexner incontinence scores (1.54 vs. 3.43, p = 0.009). Adenomas or carcinomas at the ATZ were identified in 29.2% of patients, with a higher 5-year adenoma recurrence in the stapled group (20.1% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.02). Most adenomas were successfully managed endoscopically, with no cancer progression in the stapled group. Two cancers occurred in the hand-sewn group during long-term follow-up. Stapled IPAA offers advantages in operative efficiency and anorectal function, with higher adenoma recurrence manageable under surveillance. These findings suggest stapled IPAA may be a reasonable surgical option for FAP when coupled with diligent follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.