ArticleJournal of gambling studies2026
Validation and Measurement of Attitudes Towards Gambling: The Case of the Basque Country.
Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gambling is deeply rooted in Basque society due to its high participation. However, in recent times it has been the focus of public debates. This study aims to offer a first sociological approach to the phenomenon of gambling in the Basque Country and to explore social attitudes towards it. To this end, an attempt was made to apply the Attitudes Towards Gambling Studies, carried out in other contexts, although the results were not fully satisfactory. In response, the Synthetic Index of Attitudes towards Gambling (SIAG) was designed and applied in order to better capture the specificities of the Basque case. The SIAG has made it possible to detect a marked polarization in attitudes towards gambling. Based on the responses to different items related to regulation, danger, economic impact and (i)responsibility associated with gambling, three clearly differentiated profiles have been identified: people opposed to gambling, people who are ambivalent and people who are in favor of gambling. In summary, despite a generalized negative perception of gambling and pejorative attitudes derived from its consequences, these are not strong enough to discourage gambling or eliminate its recognition as a relevant economic agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.