ArticleJournal of medical systems2025
Digital Twins for Monitoring Neuromotor Development in Preterm Infants: Conceptual Framework and Proof-of-concept Study.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Can slow and (un)steady still win the race? A narrative review of developmental gait characteristics and clinical implications in children born preterm.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preterm birth leads to an increased risk of long-term consequences, with over 50% of children born <30 weeks facing motor, cognitive, or behavioural impairments. Early monitoring of motor developmental trajectories, strongly associated with neurodevelopmental outcome, is crucial for a timely identification of deviations from the reference path and the prediction of possible neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). However, the current understanding of the causal pathways through which motor difficulties emerge and evolve is limited by the lack of quantitative, standardised, and interpretative measures for infant motor development, and the need for a complex multidisciplinary examination of medical history. To overcome these limitations, we propose an approach based on Digital Twins (DTs) and innovative technology-based interpretative metrics for motor assessment to support holistic longitudinal evaluations of infant development. The DT enables the integration of multimodal data, including algorithms for data processing and artificial intelligence methods for data analysis, into a unique framework. Details on the DT ecosystem, internal model, and engine are provided. As a first step, a proof-of-concept application was implemented to show the feasibility of the framework, not yet exploring its full longitudinal potential. This initial study was based on already published data (17 full-term children, 21 preterm children born between 29 and 36 gestational weeks, and 8 very preterm children born ≤28 gestational weeks) and illustrates the integration of motor measures with clinical and cognitive information, their standardisation into the DT model, and a first set of advanced analyses. Given the relevance of the problem and the lack of standardised, structured follow-up protocols to monitor motor trajectory in preterm children, the proposed solution has the potential for a significant impact in clinical practice. Moreover, its usable and scalable design allows for easy adaptation to large, multi-center cohort studies targeting various infant clinical populations where motor function monitoring is essential (i.e. from children with rare neurological disorders to all newborns).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.