ArticleActa neurochirurgica2025
Outcome in adult patients with severe TBI, using a management protocol allowing a cerebral perfusion pressure ≤ 60 mmHg - a retrospective study over 10 years.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring on Outcomes in Older Adults with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Management and outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury treated in three major Nordic intensive care units: a comparative cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Development of a nutritional management protocol for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a Delphi study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Increased intracranial pressure in severe traumatic axonal injury patients - A retrospective single-center study.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Favourable outcome in a subset of ultra-severe traumatic brain injury patients - a single-centre retrospective study.Brain & spine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent guidelines for the treatment of severe TBI recommend maintaining a cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) at 60-70 mmHg. In our institution, as well as others, an alternative algorithm-originally named the Lund concept-has been used. This treatment algorithm employs metoprolol and clonidine to limit CPP, accepting levels below 60 mmHg, with the aim of reducing cerebral edema. Previous reports on this algorithm have shown promising outcome in severe TBI cohorts when compared with many contemporary practices; however, no population-based studies have been conducted to validate these findings. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the outcome in adult severe TBI using the Lund Concept algorithm in a population-based cohort and how are CPP levels lower than 60 mmHg tolerated?
methodsThe study included 135 evaluable adult patients out of 171 admitted with severe TBI over a ten-year period in the southern Swedish healthcare region. Baseline data, intracranial pressure (ICP), CPP, treatment duration, surgical interventions, and administered drugs were correlated to the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE).
resultsThe 30-day and 6-month mortality rates were 16% and 20%, respectively. A favorable outcome (GOSE 5-8) was achieved in 48% of patients. Only increasing age was associated with inferior outcomes.
conclusionThe use of a management protocol accepting lower CPP levels than those recommended in existing guidelines was generally well tolerated with outcome in line with comparable reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.