Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41128918›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2025

Outcome in adult patients with severe TBI, using a management protocol allowing a cerebral perfusion pressure ≤ 60 mmHg - a retrospective study over 10 years.

Linus Réen, Anna Radman, Edward Visse, David Cederberg, Niklas Marklund, Peter Siesjö

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Linus RéenDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. linus.reen@med.lu.se.
Anna RadmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Edward VisseDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
David CederbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Niklas MarklundDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Peter SiesjöDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

Region Skåne Regionalt forskningsstöd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent guidelines for the treatment of severe TBI recommend maintaining a cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) at 60-70 mmHg. In our institution, as well as others, an alternative algorithm-originally named the Lund concept-has been used. This treatment algorithm employs metoprolol and clonidine to limit CPP, accepting levels below 60 mmHg, with the aim of reducing cerebral edema. Previous reports on this algorithm have shown promising outcome in severe TBI cohorts when compared with many contemporary practices; however, no population-based studies have been conducted to validate these findings. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the outcome in adult severe TBI using the Lund Concept algorithm in a population-based cohort and how are CPP levels lower than 60 mmHg tolerated?

methodsThe study included 135 evaluable adult patients out of 171 admitted with severe TBI over a ten-year period in the southern Swedish healthcare region. Baseline data, intracranial pressure (ICP), CPP, treatment duration, surgical interventions, and administered drugs were correlated to the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE).

resultsThe 30-day and 6-month mortality rates were 16% and 20%, respectively. A favorable outcome (GOSE 5-8) was achieved in 48% of patients. Only increasing age was associated with inferior outcomes.

conclusionThe use of a management protocol accepting lower CPP levels than those recommended in existing guidelines was generally well tolerated with outcome in line with comparable reports.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticCerebrovascular CirculationIntracranial PressureAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleGlasgow Outcome ScaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCerebral perfusion pressureGlasgow Outcome Scale – extended (GOS-E)Intracranial pressureLund ConceptNeurointensive careTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID41128918
PMCPMC12549425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.