ArticleRheumatology international2025
Social media landscape: a cross-sectional survey of health professionals.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combating Dermatologic Misinformation on Social Media via a Training Program for Health Care Professionals: Protocol for a 2-Phase Pilot Mixed Methods Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Sources of reproductive health information and their associations with self-reported contraceptive familiarity and education needs among female college students: a cross-sectional study in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social networks are widely used in the healthcare system for education, research, and professional networking. However, its adoption and impact in Central Asia, particularly among medical professionals, remain underexplored. This study assesses social media usage patterns, motivations, and perceived challenges among healthcare professionals in Kazakhstan, with a focus on professional engagement, information-seeking behaviours, and the need for structured training. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among healthcare professionals in Kazakhstan from November 2022 to January 2023 after extensive pilot-testing by a multi-professional team. The questionnaire comprised multiple-choice and open-ended questions, and Likert scale answers to explore, social media preferences for professional engagement, and future possibilities. Among 147 respondents (M:F ratio = 1:1.17, median age = 32 years), social media adoption was nearly universal (97.96%, n = 144). The primary reasons for usage were knowledge acquisition (81.94%, n = 118), skill development (79.16%, n = 114), and maintaining social connections (68.05%, n = 98). YouTube and Instagram were the most frequently accessed platforms. Despite the perceived professional utility of social media, 75% (n = 108) of respondents felt overwhelmed, and only 65.27% (n = 94) considered it a secure means of communication.69% (n = 99) had never attended training on optimal social media use for professional growth, and 98.61% (n = 142) expressing willingness to participate in future trainings. The social media landscape among healthcare professionals in Kazakhstan reveals nuanced patterns of platform utilisation. The perceived utility of these platforms is tempered by acknowledged challenges, highlighting a critical need for structured guidance and comprehensive professional training frameworks tailored to the unique digital communication environment of Central Asian healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.