ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
A real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) events for cabazitaxel.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the real-world safety profile of cabazitaxel by analyzing adverse events (AEs) from the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database using data mining techniques. A total of 20,411,174 AE reports from the second quarter of 2010 to the first quarter of 2025 were collected. After screening, 2008 reports with cabazitaxel as the primary suspected drug were included in the analysis. Four signal detection methods were employed: reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS). The final signal mining identified 118 preferred terms (PTs) across 26 system organ categories (SOCs). The results showed that cabazitaxel-related AEs primarily occurred in males (85.81%) and elderly patients aged 65-75 years (34.11%), with the most common severe outcomes including hospitalization (27.79%) and death (21.12%). AEs primarily involved hematological and lymphatic system disorders (e.g., febrile neutropenia, neutropenia, and anemia), gastrointestinal disorders, and infections. Additionally, signal strength analysis identified several potential AEs not mentioned in the drug labels, such as pigmentary glaucoma, cystitis radiation, primary thrombocythemia, nephrostomy, and recall phenomena. This study revealed the known and potential risks of cabazitaxel, suggesting that clinical monitoring of drug use should be strengthened, especially in elderly patients, and the management of hematological toxicity. Simultaneously, attention should be paid to rare but significant adverse reactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41128899What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.