Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41128860›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2025

Impact of the Mayo adhesive probability score on ESWL outcomes for proximal ureteral stones.

Cem Tuğrul Gezmiş, Nusret Can Çilesiz, Serdar Turan, Mustafa Satılmışoğlu, Ali Eroğlu, Mustafa Bahadır Can Balcı

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cem Tuğrul GezmişDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Taksim Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1634-4516
Nusret Can ÇilesizDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Taksim Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2115-698X
Serdar TuranDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Taksim Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4894-4441
Mustafa SatılmışoğluDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Taksim Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9343-8819
Ali EroğluDepartment of Urology, Torbalı State Hospital, Izmir, Türkiye, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5545-5892
Mustafa Bahadır Can BalcıDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Taksim Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye, Turkey. mustafabahadircan.balci@sbu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0395-1154

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) success in patients with proximal ureteral stones. We retrospectively analyzed 216 patients who underwent ESWL for isolated proximal ureteral stones between March 2020 and May 2025. Demographic and radiological parameters, including stone size, stone density, skin-to-stone distance, and MAP score, were recorded. The MAP score was calculated using non-contrast computed tomography by assessing posterior perinephric fat thickness and perinephric fat stranding. Treatment success was defined as no ureteral stone; residual fragments ≤ 4 mm were permitted only if located in the kidney after the ESWL procedure at 3-month follow-up. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of ESWL success. The overall ESWL success rate was 63%. Patients with a MAP score < 3 achieved significantly higher success rates than those with a MAP score ≥ 3 (76.9% vs. 45.3%). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, stone size > 10 mm (odds ratio [OR] 0.340, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.179-0.647), MAP score ≥ 3 (OR 0.266, 95% CI 0.140-0.507), and a prolonged interval between computed tomography and ESWL (OR 0.956, 95% CI 0.927-0.985) were identified as independent predictors of reduced success. A higher MAP score, larger stone size, and longer pre-treatment interval are associated with lower ESWL success in proximal ureteral stones. MAP scoring provides a simple, reproducible, imaging-based tool that may assist in patient selection and support treatment planning.

Indexed as

LithotripsyUreteral CalculiAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeESWLMayo adhesive probability scorePerinephric fatProximal ureteral stonesUrolithiasis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.