ArticleDysphagia2026
Does Inclusion of Thickened Liquids in a Modified Barium Swallow Study (MBSS) Protocol Affect DIGEST Grades?
Article in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DIGEST Grades Remain Stable With Inclusion of Moderately Thickened Liquids in the Videofluoroscopic Examination in Individuals With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) is a psychometric tool used during modified barium swallow studies (MBSSs) to grade swallowing safety, efficiency, and overall pharyngeal swallow function ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 4 (life-threatening). DIGEST was originally validated on a protocol without routine inclusion of thickened liquids. To ensure stability of DIGEST in different settings, we aimed to assess whether DIGEST grades remained stable when derived from a bolus protocol with or without standard inclusion of thickened liquids. MBSSs from 118 unique participants were retrospectively analyzed by 4 reliable raters using a master protocol of thin, thickened, pudding, and solid boluses. DIGEST grades were derived from four bolus protocol conditions: (1) DIGEST core protocol (without thickened liquids); (2) core plus mildly thick liquid; (3) core plus moderately thick; and (4) core plus mildly and moderately thick. Prevalence and Bias-Adjusted Kappa (PABAK) values were calculated to determine agreement of DIGEST grades between the core protocol and variations. PABAK ranged from 0.83 to 1.00 (near-perfect to perfect agreement). In rare instances where thickened liquids affected grades, they invariably worsened by one grade. There was no clear change-driving bolus type for this effect. Safety was more susceptible to change than efficiency. Inclusion of thickened liquids does not appear necessary in a minimum bolus protocol for DIGEST. Clinicians and researchers who wish to routinely include thickened liquids in their protocol should be aware that DIGEST grades may be worsened by one in a minority of cases and that safety grades appear more likely to be affected than efficiency grades.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.