ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
Enhancing trustworthiness in model-guided medicine with a model identity certificate (MIC): starting with interventional disciplines.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeModel-guided medicine (MGM) represents a paradigm shift in clinical practice, emphasizing the integration of computational models to support diagnosis, therapy planning and individualized patient care. The general and/or specific domain models, on which recommendations, decisions or actions of these systems are based, should reflect in their model identity certificate (MIC) the level of model relevance, truthfulness and transparency.
methodsMethods and tools for building models and their corresponding templates for a MIC in the domains of radiology and surgery should be drawn from relevant elements of a model science, specifically from mathematical modelling methods (e.g. for model truthfulness) and modelling informatics tools (e.g. for model transparency). Other elements or MIC classes to consider may include ethics, human-AI model interaction and model control.
resultsA generic template of a MIC with classes, attributes and examples for the general domain of health care is being proposed as an initial attempt to gain experience with the complexity of the problems associated with enhancing trustworthiness in models. This template is intended to serve as a framework for an instance of a specific template for robot assisted intervention for hepatocellular cancer within the domain of interventional radiology (work-in-progress).
conclusionGaining trustworthiness in intelligent systems based on models and related AI tools is a challenging undertaking and raises many critical questions, specifically those related to ascertain model relevance, truthfulness and transparency. The healthcare system, in particular the interventional medical disciplines, will have to be concerned about the availability of digital identity certificates to enable the control for these systems and related artefacts, e.g. digital twins, avatars, diagnostic and interventional robots, or intelligent agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41128840What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.