ArticleParasitology research2025
Factors associated with detecting pathogenic intestinal parasites in multiple stool microscopy samples: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
Article in Parasitology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Determining the optimal number of stool samples for accurate parasite detection is crucial in healthcare. However, previous studies have reported conflicting results. This study investigated factors associated with the detection of pathogenic intestinal parasites in additional stool microscopy examinations. This retrospective cross-sectional study at a tertiary care hospital outpatient clinic included patients who submitted three stool samples between 2012 and 2021 and had at least one pathogenic intestinal parasite-positive stool sample. Diagnostic yields for one, two, and three stool specimens were the primary outcome. The secondary outcome was the identification of factors associated with the time to the first positive stool microscopy result, which was analysed using ordinal logistic regression. Among the 103 infected patients, compared with the infection detection rate in the first specimen, the rate increased with the second specimen and further increased with the third specimen, achieving a cumulative detection rate of 100%. Some parasites, such as hookworms, were easily detected in the first sample. However, more than half the patients infected with Trichuris trichiura and all patients infected with Isospora belli were missed if only one stool specimen was collected. Immunocompetent hosts were significantly more likely to have pathogenic intestinal parasites detected in later stool specimens (adjusted ordinal odds ratio = 3.94 [95% confidence interval: 1.34-14.05]). Collecting multiple stool specimens was associated with a higher likelihood of detecting pathogenic intestinal parasites, particularly in immunocompetent patients. Clinicians may request a second or even a third sample if the first is negative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.