ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2025
Identifying and predicting dietary patterns in the Dutch population using machine learning.
Article in European journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the Analytical Landscape of Gene-Diet Interactions in Epidemiology: From Classical Models to Causal and Multi-Omics Frameworks.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Traditional and Non-Traditional Clustering Techniques for Identifying Chrononutrition Patterns in University Students.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Precision Nutrition: A Paradigm Evolution in Dietary Assessment and Intervention.Nutrients · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNutritional epidemiological research is shifting its focus from individual nutrients to dietary patterns, which challenges traditional statistical methods. Here, we aim to apply various machine learning algorithms to identify and predict dietary patterns in the Dutch population.
methodsData on food consumption, sociodemographic and lifestyle factors from 867 males and 866 females participating in the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey (DNFCS) were analysed. K-means, K-medoids, and hierarchical clustering were compared to identify dietary patterns by sex. Six classifiers (naïve Bayes, K-nearest neighbours, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine and xgboost) were used to predict identified dietary patterns based on sociodemographic and lifestyle factors.
resultsAfter comparison, the optimal clustering method, K-means clustering, identified two distinct dietary patterns for both sexes, i.e. Traditional and Health-conscious patterns. The Traditional pattern was characterised by a higher energy intake and consumption of bread, potatoes, red and processed meat, coffee, fats and oils, and sugary drinks. Conversely, a higher intake of fruit, vegetables, tea, nuts, seeds, and breakfast cereals characterised the Health-conscious pattern. The classification models demonstrated moderate predictive accuracies (60-68%). According to the classifiers, the most important predictors for both sexes were education level, age, and BMI.
conclusionMachine learning algorithms can be useful in identifying dietary patterns in population studies. We identified Health-conscious and Traditional patterns in a Dutch population, suggesting tailored public health interventions towards individuals adhering to a Traditional pattern. Future research should improve model validity and reproducibility to enhance its applicability in public health interventions and dietary guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.