Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41128787›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2026

Barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies for pharmacogenomics in community pharmacies: a cross-sectional survey among local champions in pharmacies and key opinion leaders in pharmacogenomics.

Pantea Kiani, Pierre M Bet, Naomi T Jessurun, Petra Hoogland, Jeroen Mentink, Jesse J Swen, Sander D Borgsteede

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pantea KianiDivision of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3073-9749
Pierre M BetDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pm.bet@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6735-7379
Naomi T JessurunNetherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8267-1259
Petra HooglandDepartment of Pharmaceutical Affairs, Service Apotheek Beheer B.V., Enter, The Netherlands.
Jeroen MentinkCommunity Pharmacist, Borrendamme Pharmacy, Zierikzee, the Netherlands.
Jesse J SwenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3965-5552
Sander D BorgsteedeDepartment of Clinical Decision Support, Health Base Foundation, Houten, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPharmacogenomics (PGx) tailors drug treatments to an individual's genetic profile and contributes to improved efficacy and reduced adverse drug reactions. Community pharmacists have shown interest in PGx, and Dutch pharmacists have been early adopters in applying PGx guidelines, particularly through integration of the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group recommendations. Despite growing evidence of its benefits, large-scale implementation in community pharmacies remains limited. This raises an important question for global stakeholders: if PGx adoption is constrained even in a system with robust infrastructure and guidelines, what lessons can be drawn for broader implementation?

aimTo examine current PGx practices in leading Dutch community pharmacies and to identify key barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies for integrating PGx into routine pharmacy care.

methodA cross-sectional survey was conducted among Dutch pharmacy professionals with experience in PGx implementation. Participants were categorized as key opinion leaders (KOLs), involved in national PGx policymaking, research, or representing academia or professional organizations, or local champions (LCs), defined as practicing pharmacists directly involved in local PGx implementation in hospital or community pharmacies. The questionnaire was retrospectively mapped to Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and qualitative responses were inductively thematically grouped to contextualize findings.

resultsOf the 67 invited professionals, 46 completed the questionnaire (response rate: 69%). Among respondents, 70% were LCs and 30% KOLs. Among KOLs (n = 14), the most frequently cited barriers included costs (79%, n = 11/14), inadequate Information and Communication Technology (ICT) support (29%, n = 4/14), and legal or regulatory uncertainty (29%, n = 4/14). A positive view on the clinical value of PGx was reported by 81% of LCs (n = 26/32) and 93% of KOLs (n = 13/14). Suggested facilitators by LCs included improved ICT infrastructure (56%, n = 18/32), enhanced education and training (44%, n = 14/32), and stronger interdisciplinary collaboration (25%, n = 8/32).

conclusionPGx implementation in Dutch pharmacies is hindered by structural barriers such as fragmented ICT and lack of reimbursement, despite strong professional support. Embedding PGx into pharmacy workflows and aligning policy, infrastructure, and education are essential. These findings may inform broader efforts to integrate PGx into pharmacies across diverse systems.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesLeadershipPharmacistsPharmacogeneticsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsProfessional RoleSurveys and QuestionnairesCFIRCommunity pharmacyImplementation barriersImplementation strategiesPharmacogenomics

Identifiers

PMID41128787
PMCPMC12992355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.