ArticleThe ISME journal2025
Decoding emergent properties of microbial community functions through subcommunity observations and interpretable machine learning.
Article in The ISME journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- SubCom analysis: dissecting microbial community functions into taxon-specific contributions and interaction contexts.Microbiome · 2026Article
- Synthetic microbial communities for plant growth promotion and soil-borne disease suppression: design principles, mechanisms, and translational challenges.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Decoding emergent properties of microbial community functions through subcommunity observations and interpretable machine learning.The ISME journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The functions of microbial communities, including substrate conversion and pathogen suppression, arise not as a simple sum of individual species' capabilities but through complex interspecies interactions. Understanding how such functions arise from individual species and their interactions remains a major challenge, limiting efforts to rationally understand microbial roles in both natural and engineered ecosystems. Because current holistic (meta-omics) and reductionist (isolation- or single-cell-based) approaches struggle to capture these emergent microbial community functions, this study explores an intermediate strategy: analyzing simple subcommunity combinations to enable a bottom-up understanding of community-level functions. To examine the validity of this approach, we used a nine-member synthetic microbial community capable of degrading the environmental pollutant aniline, and systematically generated a dataset of 256 subcommunity combinations and their associated functions. Analyses using random forest models revealed that the subcommunity combinations of just three to four species enabled the quantitative prediction of functions in larger communities (5-9-member; Pearson's r = 0.78-0.80). Prediction performance remained robust even with limited subcommunity data, suggesting applicability to more diverse microbial communities where exhaustive subcommunity observation is infeasible. Moreover, interpreting models trained on these simple subcommunity combinations enabled the identification of key species and interspecies interactions that strongly influence the overall community function. These findings provide a methodological framework for mechanistically dissecting complex microbial community functions through subcommunity-based analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.