ArticleRheumatology and therapy2025
Real-World Effectiveness and Satisfaction with Risankizumab for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis in Biologic-Naïve Patients: A Population Survey in the United States and Europe.
Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study assessed the real-world effectiveness of risankizumab (RZB) and treatment satisfaction in biologic-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) across the USA and Europe.
methodsData were drawn from the Adelphi Real World Spondyloarthritis Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey of physicians and their adult patients with PsA receiving RZB 150 mg subcutaneous injections in Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK) and the US, conducted from June 2023-June 2024. Physicians reported changes in body surface area (BSA), dactylitis, enthesitis, TJC68, and SJC66 and assessments of pain and fatigue on a 0-10 scale (higher scores indicating worse outcomes) from initiation to data collection, evaluated using McNemar or t-tests (p < 0.05 considered significant). Clinically meaningful improvements were complete resolution of dactylitis, enthesitis, TJC68, and SJC66 and pain (≥ 1.0-unit) and fatigue (≥ 3.0-unit) reductions. Physician and patient satisfaction with disease control was also reported. Outcomes were analyzed for the full cohort and stratified by prescription of a conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) prior to the survey or at data collection vs csDMARD-naïve.
resultsOverall, 127 physicians reported on 192 patients with PsA (Europe 64%, US 36%). Mean ± SD patient age was 44.2 ± 10.7 years, and 45% were female. From RZB treatment initiation to time of data collection, resolution of dactylitis (82%) and enthesitis (90%), and improvements to TJC68 (- 3.7 ± 6.3), SJC66 (- 2.5 ± 5.1), pain (- 3.9 ± 2.4), fatigue (- 2.7 ± 2.6), and BSA (- 10 ± 10%) were observed (p < 0.001 for each) for the full cohort, with significant changes observed in both csDMARD subgroups. Patient and physician satisfaction with disease control was 95% and 98%, respectively.
conclusionBiologic-naïve patients with PsA starting RZB demonstrated significant and meaningful improvements in joint symptoms, pain, and fatigue in real-world settings. High levels of satisfaction with RZB for disease control were reported by both patients and physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.