ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2025
Kinematics of strikes in venomous snakes.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Under pressure: Clinical management of venom-induced compartment syndrome in snakebite-A scoping review of the global literature.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Venomous snakes owe their evolutionary success in part to the effectiveness of their strike. The success of a strike depends on reaching the prey quickly before it startles and has the chance to escape. Here, we present the first ever large-scale experiment comparing strike performance across 36 venomous snake species from three families (31 Viperidae, 4 Elapidae and 1 Colubridae). We used two high-speed video cameras (1000 frames s-1) to capture strikes at a ballistics gel prey and tracked the strike trajectory in three dimensions. The 3D coordinates were used to measure strike kinematics and performance. Kinematic performance was compared within Viperidae across predation style, diel activity pattern, diet, habitat type, temperature and first jaw contact with prey. Kinematic variables (peak velocity, peak acceleration, gape angle, start distance, contact angle, head size) varied by the part of the jaw that first contacts the prey. Start distance to prey also varied by peak acceleration, jaw gape angle and contact angle with prey. Vipers typically reached higher peak velocities than elapids; however, some elapids such as Acanthophis rugosus reached equally high velocities. Peak velocities were found to be higher in ambush predators and in snakes that prey on mammalian prey. Prey was often reached within 100 ms, which falls within the mammalian startle response. Behavioural differences across the three families were also observed: Viperidae performed a smooth strike that was often followed by fang repositioning; Elapidae reached their prey quickly, bit and repeatedly squeezed prey with their jaws; and Colubridae used their rear-positioned fangs by alternate jaw movement to damage the prey's surface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.