Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41128642›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2026

Rapid and Sustained Response of Biochemically Uncontrolled Acromegaly to Once-daily Oral Paltusotine Treatment.

Beverly M K Biller, Alessandra Casagrande, Atanaska Elenkova, Cesar L Boguszewski, Raquel S Jallad, Beibei Hu, Erika Hubina, Pouneh K Fazeli, Maria Fleseriu, Peter J Snyder and 8 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Current controversies in acromegaly care.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  6. The acromegaly patient experience: burden of treatment and quality of life.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  7. What is the future of acromegaly therapy?The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  8. Acromegaly complications: an update.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Beverly M K BillerNeuroendocrine and Pituitary Tumor Clinical Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4359-4622
Alessandra CasagrandeCrinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Atanaska ElenkovaDepartment of Endocrinology, Medical University-Sofia, USHATE "Acad. Ivan Penchev", Sofia 1431, Bulgaria.
Cesar L BoguszewskiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Endocrine Division (SEMPR), Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80030-110, Brazil.
Raquel S JalladNeuroendocrine Unit, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Clinics Hospital, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0006-7286-6657
Beibei HuCrinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Erika Hubina2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Central Hospital of Northern Pest-Military Hospital, Budapest 1134, Hungary.
Pouneh K FazeliNeuroendocrinology Unit, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Maria FleseriuPituitary Center, Departments of Medicine and Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9284-6289
Peter J SnyderDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Christian J StrasburgerDepartment of Medicine for Endocrinology and Metabolism, Charité Universitaetsmedizin, Campus Mitte, Berlin 10117, Germany.
Martin BidlingmaierMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, LMU Klinikum, Munich 80336, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4681-6668
Yining ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen 91054, Germany.
Beatriz SoaresDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical School of the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.
Peter J TrainerCrinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
R Scott StruthersCrinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Alan KrasnerCrinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-5658-3246
Mônica R GadelhaNeuroendocrinology Research Center/Endocrinology Division, Medical School and Hospital Universitario Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-913, Brazil.

Funding

Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPaltusotine is a nonpeptide, selective somatostatin receptor 2 agonist in development as once-daily oral treatment for acromegaly.

objectiveTo evaluate efficacy and safety of paltusotine in patients with biochemically uncontrolled acromegaly not currently receiving medical therapy.

methodsIn this phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults with medically untreated acromegaly at randomization (stratum 1: medication-naïve or off acromegaly medications ≥4 months [IGF-I ≥ 1.3 × upper limit of normal {ULN}]; stratum 2: controlled on a somatostatin receptor ligand and underwent washout [IGF-I increase ≥30% to ≥1.1 × ULN]) received paltusotine or placebo for 24 weeks.

resultsA total of 111 patients (stratum 1, n = 82; stratum 2, n = 29) enrolled (paltusotine, n = 54; placebo, n = 57). The primary endpoint of IGF-I normalization at 24 weeks was met in 55.6% of paltusotine-treated patients vs 5.3% for placebo (odds ratio [OR]: 42.81; 95% CI, 8.44-455.82; P < .0001), with superiority to placebo in both strata. Paltusotine treatment decreased IGF-I in 92.6% of patients within the first 4 weeks. All secondary endpoints were met: mean (±SE) change in IGF-I of -0.82 ± 0.08×ULN with paltusotine vs 0.09 ± 0.08×ULN with placebo (P < .0001); IGF-I < 1.3×ULN in 66.7% vs 14.0% of patients (OR: 18.32; 95% CI, 5.64-79.16; P < .0001); GH (5-sample mean) < 1.0 ng/mL in 57.4% vs 17.5% (OR: 7.59; 95% CI, 2.78-23.48; P < .0001); mean (±SE) change in Acromegaly Symptom Diary score of -2.7 ± 1.4 vs 2.8 ± 1.4 (P = .004). Most adverse events were acromegaly symptoms or mild, transitory gastrointestinal effects characteristic of somatostatin receptor ligands (eg, diarrhea, abdominal pain). Pituitary tumor volume was stable or reduced in paltusotine-treated patients.

conclusionIGF-I normalized in significantly more patients with uncontrolled acromegaly treated with paltusotine vs placebo. Paltusotine was associated with rapid, sustained IGF-I reduction, significant symptom improvement and stable or reduced pituitary tumor size and was well tolerated.

Indexed as

AcromegalyReceptors, SomatostatinAdministration, OralAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHuman Growth HormoneHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor IMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeHuman Growth HormoneInsulin-Like Growth Factor IReceptors, Somatostatinacromegalyclinical trialIGF-Ipaltusotinesomatostatinsomatostatin receptor 2

Identifiers

PMID41128642
PMCPMC13016795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.