ArticleEar and hearing
Patterns of Cochlear Implant Use and Speech Exposure in Children With Single-Sided Deafness Compared to Bimodal Devices in the Post-Pandemic Period.
Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges of Cochlear Implant Use for Spatial Hearing in Children and Adolescents With Asymmetric Hearing Including Single Sided Deafness.Trends in hearingArticle
- Benefits of Bilateral Bone Conduction Device Use Including Osia Devices in Children and Adolescents With Bilateral Atresia.Trends in hearingArticle
- Current State of Knowledge Regarding Cochlear Implantation in Children With Single-Sided Deafness.Ear and hearingArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study evaluated whether Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related decreases in device use and speech exposure in children with unilateral cochlear implants (CIs) persisted post-pandemic. It was hypothesized that CI use is lower in children with single-sided deafness (SSD) than in children using bimodal devices and that speech exposure has recovered to pre-pandemic levels.
designDatalogs (n = 608) from children with unilateral CIs (n = 111) and good hearing in their non-implanted ear (unaided pure tone average <60 dB) were analyzed across the pre-pandemic, peri-pandemic (during the pandemic), and post-pandemic periods. Participants were separated into children with single-sided deafness using a CI (SSD-CI group, n = 70), and children using a CI and contralateral hearing aid (bimodal devices group, n = 41). They were further divided by age at the start of the pandemic (preschool-aged and school-aged). Datalogs were collected from October 1, 2013 to April 1, 2024, and included daily CI use, speech duration, and speech-in-noise sounds captured by the CI.
resultsCI use was lower in the SSD-CI group (mean ± SD = 5.78 ± 3.06 hours/day) than in the bimodal devices group (7.24 ± 3.75 hours/day, p = 0.013). In addition, of 17 children lost to follow-up, 14 were in the SSD-CI group. Preschool-aged children showed a steeper increase in CI use over time from CI activation in the bimodal devices group (slope ± SE = 0.96 ± 0.14 hours/day per year) than the SSD-CI group (0.15 ± 0.19 hours/day per year, p < 0.001). CI use declined more rapidly over time in school-aged children in the SSD-CI group (-0.63 ± 0.09 hours/day per year) compared to the bimodal devices group (-0.07 ± 0.09 hours/day per year, p < 0.001). Speech exposure was similar in the SSD-CI (3.13 ± 1.83 hours/day) and bimodal devices (3.82 ± 2.11 hours/day) groups ( p = 0.08). In preschool-aged children, speech exposure increased from the pre-pandemic (3.11 ± 1.44 hours/day) to the peri-pandemic (3.51 ± 2.21 hours/day, p = 0.011) and post-pandemic period (4.53 ± 1.84 hours/day, p < 0.001) in line with increased daily CI use. In school-aged children, speech exposure decreased from the pre-pandemic (3.38 ± 1.76 hours/day) to the peri-pandemic period (2.94 ± 2.16 hours/day, p = 0.002), remaining low post-pandemic (2.91 ± 2.45 hours/day, p = 0.69). The proportion of speech exposure measured by the CI decreased from the pre-pandemic period (52.5% ± 12.2%, p = 0.99) to the peri-pandemic period (44.7% ± 16.1%, p = 0.008) and returned to pre-pandemic levels post-pandemic (51.9% ± 17.3%, p = 0.55).
conclusionsDaily CI use varies widely in children with good residual hearing in their non-implanted ear and is at greater risk for decline over time in the SSD-CI group compared to the bimodal device users. Reduced CI use in school-aged children with SSD leads to decreased hours of speech exposure through the CI. The percentage of speech exposure logged by the CI confirms that speech access declined during the pandemic but reveals an encouraging return to pre-pandemic levels after restrictions were lifted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.