ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders
Motor-Speech Performance in Very Old Speakers: Associations With Physio-Anatomical and Cognitive-Linguistic Factors.
Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Motor-Speech Performance in Very Old Speakers: Associations With Physio-Anatomical and Cognitive-Linguistic Factors.International journal of language & communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMotor-speech skills slow down with age, but health care professionals lack normative data, especially on the vastly growing population of very old (VO) speakers. The execution of different motor-speech tasks requires both fine-motoric and cognitive abilities.
aimsTo study the performance on oral diadochokinetic (DDK) rate and narrative speech tempo in typically ageing 80-100-year-old speakers and to investigate whether they are predicted by age, dentition, hearing, cognitive status, language skills or educational level.
methodsThis cross-sectional study comprises 50 typically ageing VO Finnish speakers. Their motor-speech performance was evaluated by alternating motion rate (AMR) syllables /pa/, /ta/ and /ka/ and sequential motion rate (SMR) syllable sequence /pataka/ and two speech tempo parameters (speaking and articulation rate) in semi-spontaneous narrative. The association between task performance and background variables was studied by multiple linear regression analysis.
resultsThe VO speakers' normative performance in DDK, speaking and articulation rates was predicted by physio-anatomical and cognitive-linguistic factors. Older age within the 80-100-year range was associated only with slower execution of the SMR task. Wearing dentures predicted slower tempo in the AMR tasks and articulation rate. The highest educational level predicted slower tempo in the AMR tasks. Good language skills were positively associated with motor-speech performance: Better phonemic fluency predicted faster AMR /pa/ and SMR /pataka/, and a higher Western Aphasia Battery Aphasia Quotient predicted a faster speaking rate.
conclusionsThe VO speakers had relatively well-preserved motor-speech skills. Consistent with previous studies, the mean DDK, speaking and articulation rates were, nevertheless, slower in the VO speakers than in younger speakers in prior research. As a novel finding, SMR was slower than AMR in the VO speakers, which deviates from the trend observed in Finnish adults and younger elderly. This study suggests that natural teeth, younger age and good language skills safeguard the motor-speech skills from slowing down. However, it seems characteristic for the most highly educated VO speakers to perform slower than peers in the AMR tasks. CONTRIBUTION: The results of this study will help to identify the manifestations of typical ageing. They also give insight into the life-long evolution of speech skills and into the relationship between the motoric and linguistic facets of speech. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject Motor-speech performance slows down with ageing because of physio-anatomical and cognitive-linguistic changes. Speech tempo is, thus, a sensitive biomarker for neurological alterations. What this study adds to existing knowledge Formerly missing data on very old (VO) speakers' typical motor-speech skills and their predictors. Within-group differences are promoted by age, dentition, language skills and educational level. What are the clinical implications of this work? DDK, speaking and articulation rates are suitable means for clinical motor-speech assessment even in the oldest speakers. In addition to chronological age, speech-language pathologists should consider a range of individual physio-anatomical and cognitive-linguistic factors that contribute to speech performance. We recommend conducting AMR tasks /pa/, /ta/ and /ka/ together with an SMR /pataka/ task and comparing the results with culturally valid age-specific norms (if available), as their atypical relationship may indicate neuropathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.