ArticleCancer science2026
Comparative Analysis of a Dual DNA-RNA Panel and a DNA-Only Panel for Sarcoma: Real-World Data From a Nationwide Genomic Database.
Article in Cancer science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing-based comprehensive cancer genomic profiling is promising in cancer management; however, most studies rely on tumor-only DNA panels from single institutions. In 2023, Japan introduced an insurance-covered cancer genomic profiling test-the GenMine TOP Cancer Genome Profiling System-a dual DNA-RNA panel with matched tumor-normal testing. This study evaluated its utility compared to a conventional DNA-only test (FoundationOne CDx) in managing sarcoma patients using a nationwide genetic profiling database provided by the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics. This study included 1046 patients registered between August 2023 and October 2024. The dual DNA-RNA test identified significantly more fusion genes (20.3% vs. 7.4%, p < 0.001) and therapeutically targetable kinase fusions (3.5% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.019) than the DNA-only test. Among patients with translocation-related sarcomas, histology-specific fusion genes were identified in 77.5% using the dual panel, compared to 40.0% with the DNA-only panel (p < 0.001). In non-gastrointestinal stromal tumor sarcomas, the dual test showed a trend toward higher rates of genotype-matched therapy (4.3% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.25) and a significantly higher rate of molecular targeted therapy (4.3% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.03). Additionally, 5.7% of patients had pathogenic germline variants identified through tumor-normal matched analysis. These findings suggest that a dual DNA-RNA panel with matched tumor-normal testing may improve diagnostic accuracy and inform treatment decisions in the routine clinical management of sarcoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.