Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41128349›Full record

ArticleCancer science2026

Comparative Analysis of a Dual DNA-RNA Panel and a DNA-Only Panel for Sarcoma: Real-World Data From a Nationwide Genomic Database.

Eiji Nakata, Kiichiro Ninomiya, Tatsunori Osone, Daisuke Ennishi, Shuta Tomida, Tomohiro Fujiwara, Toshiyuki Kunisada, Mashu Futagawa, Akira Hirasawa, Shinichi Toyooka and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Eiji NakataDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5971-4142
Kiichiro NinomiyaCenter for Comprehensive Genomic Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Tatsunori OsoneDepartment of Regenerative Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Daisuke EnnishiCenter for Comprehensive Genomic Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Shuta TomidaCenter for Comprehensive Genomic Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3786-936X
Tomohiro FujiwaraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4257-9180
Toshiyuki KunisadaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Mashu FutagawaDepartment of Clinical Genomic Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Akira HirasawaDepartment of Clinical Genomic Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4124-5488
Shinichi ToyookaCenter for Comprehensive Genomic Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7588-6745
Toshifumi OzakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.

Funding

KAKENHI 23K08632KAKENHI 23K08698KAKENHI 24K10453KAKENHI 24K12308KAKENHI 24K12332KAKENHI 24K12374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing-based comprehensive cancer genomic profiling is promising in cancer management; however, most studies rely on tumor-only DNA panels from single institutions. In 2023, Japan introduced an insurance-covered cancer genomic profiling test-the GenMine TOP Cancer Genome Profiling System-a dual DNA-RNA panel with matched tumor-normal testing. This study evaluated its utility compared to a conventional DNA-only test (FoundationOne CDx) in managing sarcoma patients using a nationwide genetic profiling database provided by the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics. This study included 1046 patients registered between August 2023 and October 2024. The dual DNA-RNA test identified significantly more fusion genes (20.3% vs. 7.4%, p < 0.001) and therapeutically targetable kinase fusions (3.5% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.019) than the DNA-only test. Among patients with translocation-related sarcomas, histology-specific fusion genes were identified in 77.5% using the dual panel, compared to 40.0% with the DNA-only panel (p < 0.001). In non-gastrointestinal stromal tumor sarcomas, the dual test showed a trend toward higher rates of genotype-matched therapy (4.3% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.25) and a significantly higher rate of molecular targeted therapy (4.3% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.03). Additionally, 5.7% of patients had pathogenic germline variants identified through tumor-normal matched analysis. These findings suggest that a dual DNA-RNA panel with matched tumor-normal testing may improve diagnostic accuracy and inform treatment decisions in the routine clinical management of sarcoma.

Indexed as

SarcomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorDatabases, GeneticFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultBiomarkers, Tumorcomprehensive cancer genomic profiling (CGP)fusion genesgene alterationsgenotype‐matched therapypotential germline variants (PGVs)

Identifiers

PMID41128349
PMCPMC12775561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.